A Quick Look at Fedora 23

KDE Linux Opinion

This is only the second day of the general availability of Fedora 23, so this is not a full-on review. It is just a quick look at what I have experienced so far.

I was so excited to try Fedora 23 that I broke my own rules and installed it directly on my primary workstation without so much as a test in a VM.


Yes, I was able to upgrade from Fedora 21 to Fedora 23. I have not had a successful upgrade in years and have had to resort to complete reinstallations — while saving home directory data, of course. The old fedup program never worked for me.

The network-based dnf system upgrade procedures worked very well with only one minor glitch.

I installed the dnf upgrade plugin, used the dnf system-upgrade download command to download the packages required to perform the upgrade on my system, and then rebooted to perform the upgrade.

The only problem I had was that the download procedure did not download or install the Fedora 23 public signing key. I installed that manually and the rest of the procedure worked just fine.

All in all, it took a little under 3 hours to perform the upgrade, in large part because I have a lot of things installed for testing purposes.

Plasma 5

In my look at Fedora 22, I was very critical of the state of the Plasma 5 desktop environment because it was far from complete and there were many issues that prevented me from doing the daily work that I required.

Plasma 5 in Fedora 23 is far more complete and well polished. It still has a few minor rough edges, but everything works as I expect it to. I still do not care much for the default Breeze icon set, but at least now I can change to a different set using the System Settings. Despite that, I am using the default set so I can spend enough time to give them a fair test.

Too Early For Conclusions

It is way too early for any final conclusions about Fedora 23. However my brief experience so far leads me to predict that this will be an excellent release of this staple desktop OS. And so far I have only installed the desktop version and not the server version.

I will try to post a more complete review in the News and Reviews section of this web site when I have more experience with it and some time available to do so.

KDE Plasma 5 Disappoints in Fedora 22

KDE Opinion Reviews

Although Fedora is still my distro of choice, KDE Plasma 5 (KP5) is a real disappointment and makes Fedora 22 unusable for me. It is reminiscent of the switch from KDE 3.5 to KDE 4, where many things did not work and others were simply missing.

Understand that I am a KDE fanboy; it is my favorite desktop. But KP5 is unusable for me. Even after spending days trying to make it work to meet my needs I was unable to feel even marginally comfortable with it.

Many of the widgets that were present in KDE Plasma 4 are now missing, including a few that I really find useful such as the Konqueror profiles which enable me to use four default profiles for Konqueror and to create my own. In fact, Konqueror seems to ignore profiles now, even when I try to launch them from the command line. Perhaps the profile location has moved and the KDE 4 location no longer works; but that begs the question of why make that change. Konqueror is my favorite file manager and being unable to use my own profiles with it is nearly a deal breaker all by itself.

The multimedia configuration page in System Settings was unable to detect any of the multiple soundcards I have installed in my workstation. This failure, along with the inability to deal with my preconfigured Konqueror profiles, makes it impossible for me to work effectively in KP5.

The KP5 desktop itself is usable but flat, boring and uninspiring. Perhaps simplicity and clean looks is the watchword for this release but I don’t like it.

The real problem with this are the issues I had when trying to make the desktop look good for me. There are only two options for the default desktop look and no way to download more. There are also few icon options and again, no available downloads. KP5 does not recognize my existing wallpapers and was forcing me to import each individually.  Making changes to the desktop such as pointer schemes and various modifications to application appearance cause the desktop to crash repeatedly.

Underneath there are no major changes to Fedora 22 itself. The major changes like systemd, the new anaconda installer, and firewalld are well past. But the new Anaconda installer still sucks!

I did try to use various forms of GNOME, including Cinnamon and MATE, but I find those desktops too restrictive for me. So I went back to Fedora 21 with KDE Plasma 4 and I am now happy again. I will wait until KP5 is fixed before I upgrade to a newer version of Fedora – just as I did when KP4 made its appearance.

Ironically, this decision to revert to Fedora 21 is a reflection of my own somewhat inflexible approach to my desire for a flexible desktop experience. I like KDE Plasma 4 and the extreme flexibility it gives me. I find myself hampered and seriously annoyed by the lack of the features and flexibility in KP5 that I have grown used to in KP4 and I am unwilling to deal with those shortcomings for any length of time.

My main question is why would one release a desktop so seriously full of holes and annoyances?