Although Fedora is still my distro of choice, KDE Plasma 5 (KP5) is a real disappointment and makes Fedora 22 unusable for me. It is reminiscent of the switch from KDE 3.5 to KDE 4, where many things did not work and others were simply missing.
Understand that I am a KDE fanboy; it is my favorite desktop. But KP5 is unusable for me. Even after spending days trying to make it work to meet my needs I was unable to feel even marginally comfortable with it.
Many of the widgets that were present in KDE Plasma 4 are now missing, including a few that I really find useful such as the Konqueror profiles which enable me to use four default profiles for Konqueror and to create my own. In fact, Konqueror seems to ignore profiles now, even when I try to launch them from the command line. Perhaps the profile location has moved and the KDE 4 location no longer works; but that begs the question of why make that change. Konqueror is my favorite file manager and being unable to use my own profiles with it is nearly a deal breaker all by itself.
The multimedia configuration page in System Settings was unable to detect any of the multiple soundcards I have installed in my workstation. This failure, along with the inability to deal with my preconfigured Konqueror profiles, makes it impossible for me to work effectively in KP5.
The KP5 desktop itself is usable but flat, boring and uninspiring. Perhaps simplicity and clean looks is the watchword for this release but I don’t like it.
The real problem with this are the issues I had when trying to make the desktop look good for me. There are only two options for the default desktop look and no way to download more. There are also few icon options and again, no available downloads. KP5 does not recognize my existing wallpapers and was forcing me to import each individually. Making changes to the desktop such as pointer schemes and various modifications to application appearance cause the desktop to crash repeatedly.
Underneath there are no major changes to Fedora 22 itself. The major changes like systemd, the new anaconda installer, and firewalld are well past. But the new Anaconda installer still sucks!
I did try to use various forms of GNOME, including Cinnamon and MATE, but I find those desktops too restrictive for me. So I went back to Fedora 21 with KDE Plasma 4 and I am now happy again. I will wait until KP5 is fixed before I upgrade to a newer version of Fedora – just as I did when KP4 made its appearance.
Ironically, this decision to revert to Fedora 21 is a reflection of my own somewhat inflexible approach to my desire for a flexible desktop experience. I like KDE Plasma 4 and the extreme flexibility it gives me. I find myself hampered and seriously annoyed by the lack of the features and flexibility in KP5 that I have grown used to in KP4 and I am unwilling to deal with those shortcomings for any length of time.
My main question is why would one release a desktop so seriously full of holes and annoyances?